To Be Limited Partnership v. Jude Hudson
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20202:20-cv-03238California506 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
Case No. CV 20-3238-JFW(MAAx) Date: April 21, 2020 Title: To Be Limited Partnership -v- Jude Hudson et al
PRESENT:
HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
None None
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FORUM
SELECTION CLAUSE
On April 7, 2020, Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint, and on April 20, 2020, filed a First Amended Complaint against Defendants Jude Hudson and Rosalie Hudson and nominal Defendants Paragon Technology & Development, Inc. and Gatsby Enterprises, Inc. The Court tentatively concludes that the allegations in the First Amended Complaint in large part arise out of the transactions evidenced or contemplated by the Amended and Restated Promissory Note attached as Exhibit A to the First Amended Complaint. See First Amended Complaint…