To Be Limited Partnership v. Jude Hudson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20202:20-cv-03238California506 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-3238-JFW(MAAx) Date: April 21, 2020 Title: To Be Limited Partnership -v- Jude Hudson et al

PRESENT:

HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

None None

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FORUM

SELECTION CLAUSE

On April 7, 2020, Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint, and on April 20, 2020, filed a First Amended Complaint against Defendants Jude Hudson and Rosalie Hudson and nominal Defendants Paragon Technology & Development, Inc. and Gatsby Enterprises, Inc. The Court tentatively concludes that the allegations in the First Amended Complaint in large part arise out of the transactions evidenced or contemplated by the Amended and Restated Promissory Note attached as Exhibit A to the First Amended Complaint. See First Amended Complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.