Walter Dean Ornelas v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WALTER DEAN O., ) No. SACV 19-163 AGR ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ) ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Plaintiff1 filed this action on January 28, 2019. The parties filed a Joint Stipulation that addressed the disputed issues. The court has taken the matter under submission without oral argument.2 Having reviewed the entire file, the court affirms the decision of the Commissioner.3 22 23 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 25 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties consented to proceed before the 26 magistrate judge. (Dkt. Nos. 9, 10.) 27 This order is without prejudice to the determination of an onset…