Brett Andrew v. Daniel Austin Walzl
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20202:20-cv-03423California2,097 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL
Case No. 20-3423 AB (PVCx) Date: April 23, 2020 Title Brett Andrew v. Daniel Austin Walzl
Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge
Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None
PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT
PETITIONER’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS BE DENIED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
(Dkt. No. 2) On April 13, 2020, Petitioner Brett Andrew, who also identifies himself as “Brett Andrew: House of Nelson” or “Brett Andrew Nelson,” a Colorado resident proceeding pro se, filed a document captioned “Motion to Confirm Forigen Judgement [sic] Award” pursuant to 9 U.S.C. 8 9. “Motion,” Dkt. No. 1, at 3). The Motion is supported by a Memorandum of Law, (id. at 4-8), a copy of an alleged arbitration award, (id. at 9-14), a “Cover Sheet Motion to Confirm Forigen…