Brett Andrew v. Daniel Austin Walzl

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20202:20-cv-03423California2,097 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

Case No. 20-3423 AB (PVCx) Date: April 23, 2020 Title Brett Andrew v. Daniel Austin Walzl

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT

PETITIONER’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS BE DENIED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

(Dkt. No. 2) On April 13, 2020, Petitioner Brett Andrew, who also identifies himself as “Brett Andrew: House of Nelson” or “Brett Andrew Nelson,” a Colorado resident proceeding pro se, filed a document captioned “Motion to Confirm Forigen Judgement [sic] Award” pursuant to 9 U.S.C. 8 9. “Motion,” Dkt. No. 1, at 3). The Motion is supported by a Memorandum of Law, (id. at 4-8), a copy of an alleged arbitration award, (id. at 9-14), a “Cover Sheet Motion to Confirm Forigen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.