Amber Zaneta Crutchfield v. Nancy A. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMBER C., Case No. 2:19-cv-03208-MAA 12 Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND

13 v. ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF

THE COMMISSIONER

14 ANDREW M. SAUL,2 Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 18 On April 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for Supplemental Security Income pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act. This matter is fully briefed and ready for decision. For the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s final decision is affirmed, and this action is dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 27 2 The Commissioner of Social Security is substituted as the Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). …