Lina Noory v. Camden Development, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20202:20-cv-01767California1,962 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LINA NOORY, Case No. CV 20-01767-AB (GJSx)

Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND AND

CAMDEN DEVELOPMENT, INC.; REQUEST FOR JUST COSTS

AND DOES 1 – 5, AND ACTUAL EXPENSES

Defendants.

17 Before the Court is Plaintiff Lina Noory’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Remand. (“Motion,” Dkt. No. 12.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion. I. BACKGROUND On November 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed her Complaint (“Compl.”) in state court alleging ten causes of action stemming from toxic mold in her apartment at the property Defendant owned. See Compl. (Dkt. No. 1-2). On December 20, 2019,

25 1 The causes of action are: (1) Breach of implied warranty of habitability, (2) premises 26 liability, (3) negligence, (4) nuisance, (5) breach of contract, (6) breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (7) breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment, (8) negligent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.