Antonio Fernandez v. Narinder Singh Golen

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20205:19-cv-01086California3,649 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

3

7 United States District Court Central District of California

11 ANTONIO FERNANDEZ, Case No. 5:19-cv-01086-ODW (SHKx) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v.

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF

14 NARINDER SINGH GOLEN; DEFAULT JUDGMENT [23] SAMARINDER SINGH, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez moves for entry of default judgment (“Motion”) 19 against Defendants Narinder Singh Golen (“Singh Golen”) and Samarinder Singh 20 (“Singh”) for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). (See 21 generally Appl. for Default J. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 23.) For the reasons discussed below, 22 the Court GRANTS Fernandez’s Motion for Default Judgment.1 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Fernandez alleges the following facts. Fernandez is paralyzed from the waist 25 down and uses a wheelchair for mobility. (Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1.) Defendants Singh 26 Golen and Singh own the real property located at 17294 Valley Blvd. in Fontana,

28 1 After carefully considering the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.