Antonio Fernandez v. Narinder Singh Golen
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
3
7 United States District Court Central District of California
11 ANTONIO FERNANDEZ, Case No. 5:19-cv-01086-ODW (SHKx) Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
v.
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF
14 NARINDER SINGH GOLEN; DEFAULT JUDGMENT [23] SAMARINDER SINGH, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez moves for entry of default judgment (“Motion”) 19 against Defendants Narinder Singh Golen (“Singh Golen”) and Samarinder Singh 20 (“Singh”) for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). (See 21 generally Appl. for Default J. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 23.) For the reasons discussed below, 22 the Court GRANTS Fernandez’s Motion for Default Judgment.1 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Fernandez alleges the following facts. Fernandez is paralyzed from the waist 25 down and uses a wheelchair for mobility. (Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1.) Defendants Singh 26 Golen and Singh own the real property located at 17294 Valley Blvd. in Fontana,
28 1 After carefully considering the…