Janice Deutsch v. Rick Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20205:19-cv-00824California1,001 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 JANICE DEUTSCH, ) N O . E D C V - - J L S ( K S) 11 Petitioner, ) ) v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND ) ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED RICK HILL, Warden, ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) Respondent. ) _________________________________ )

17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, all the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has raised objections. Pertinent objections are addressed below. Petitioner’s objections are overruled. 24 In Ground One, Petitioner objects that her right to compulsory process was violated because the victim did not testify at trial. (Dkt. No. 25 at 7-10.) As stated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.