Warden

Michael Paul Rosas v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20205:19-cv-00760California786 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 19-0760 SVW (PVC) Date: May 1, 2020 Title Michael Paul Rosas v. Warden

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

STAY IN THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE VACATED FOR

PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO FILE A STATUS REPORT

On April 19, 2019, Petitioner, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, constructively filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 alleging two grounds for federal habeas relief.1 (“Petition,” Dkt. No. 1). The Petition alleged that: (1) the trial court erred in excluding prior testimony of an unavailable witness; and (2) the exclusion deprived Petitioner of the right to present a defense. (Id. at 6). Respondent filed an Answer to the Petition on June 17, 2019. (“Ans.,” Dkt. No. 9). In the interim, Petitioner moved for a stay so that he could attempt to exhaust two additional grounds for relief in state court that had not been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.