Dawna Brady v. Michael Leahy

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20205:19-cv-02457California1,141 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. ED CV 19-2457 FMO (SPx) Date May 6, 2020 Title Dawna Brady v. Michael Leahy, et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff: Attorney Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Remanding Action On September 3, 2019, Dawna Brady (“plaintiff” or “Brady”) filed a complaint (“Complaint”) in the Riverside County Superior Court (“state court”) against Michael Leahy (“Leahy”), Xudle Inc. (“Xudle”), Xudle Software, LLC (“Xudle Software”), and Fullsteam Holdings, LLC (“Fullsteam”), asserting several state law employment-related claims. (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at 2; Dkt. 1-1, Complaint). On November 20, 2019, plaintiff filed an amendment to the Complaint correcting the name of Xudle to XI Holdings, Inc. (“XI Holdings”). (See Dkt. 1-3, Amendment to Complaint). After Xudle Software and Fullsteam were dismissed, (see Dkt. 1, NOR at 2), Leahy and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.