Lordell Jones v. Jeffrey Haga

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20205:18-cv-02574California648 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 18-2574 AB (PVC) Date: May 7, 2020 Title Lordell Jones v. Jeffrey Haga, et al.

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT

THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

Plaintiff, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1). The Court subsequently issued an Order Dismissing Complaint with Leave to Amend due to the Complaint’s various pleading defects. (“ODLA,” Dkt. No. 27). Plaintiff was required to file an amended complaint by April 20, 2020 if he still wished to pursue this action. (See id. at 15). The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that the failure to file an amended complaint by the Court’s deadline would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed with prejudice for failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.