C.A.M.

C.A.M. v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20205:18-cv-01725California3,073 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-EASTERN DIVISION 11 C.A.M., ) Case No. EDCV 18-01725-AS1 ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ) v. ) WITH PREJUDICE ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner ) of the Social Security ) Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ) 18 19 For the reasons discussed below, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this 20 action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with Court 21 Orders and for failure to prosecute. 22 23 24 25 The parties have consented to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. (Docket Entry Nos. 13-14). Andrew M. Saul, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is substituted for his predecessor. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(d). I. INTRODUCTION 2 On August 17, 2018, Plaintiff C.A.M. (“Plaintiff”), by and through guardian ad litem Carolyn Givan Medina, filed a Complaint for Review of Social…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.