Sammy Lee Morris v. E. Burrkhouse
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20202:19-cv-05839California4,289 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 SAMMY LEE MORRIS, Case No. CV 19-5839-SVW (KK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT
WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AND
E. BURRKHOUSE, ET AL., DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS AS MOOT
Defendants. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Sammy Lee Morris (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). The sole remaining claim in the Complaint appears to be an Eighth Amendment claim against defendants E. Burrkhouse, C. King, M. Rosales, D. Schumacher, J. Anderson, J. Curiel, and Dr. Scott (“Defendants”). Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. As discussed below, the Court dismisses the Complaint with leave to amend and denies Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss as MOOT. /// /// II. BACKGROUND On June 30, 2019, Plaintiff…