Matthew Robey v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20208:20-cv-00367California1,775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, a citizen of California, filed this “lemon law” action in Orange County Superior Court on January 15, 2020. (Compl., Doc. 1-2.) In the Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants FCA and Surf City Auto Group, Inc. dba Huntington Beach CDJ Ram (“Surf City”) violated California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (the “Song-Beverly Act”) by selling Plaintiff a defective vehicle, failing to repair the vehicle “after a reasonable number of attempts,” and then refusing to repurchase the vehicle or otherwise make restitution to Plaintiff. (See id. ¶¶ 12, 14, 20.) Accordingly, in his Complaint, Plaintiff brings two claims: the first for breach of the implied warranty of

1 The Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for May 15, 2020, at 10:30 a.m., is

VACATED.

____________________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:20-cv-00367-JLS-DFM Date: May 14, 2020 Title: Matthew Robey v. FCA US LLC et al. merchantability…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.