Yasmin Kanji v. Bank of America, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20202:20-cv-03820California447 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YASMIN KANJI, an ) CV 20-3820-RSWL-SK individual, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: ) SUBJECT MATTER ) JURISDICTION v. ) ) ) BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a ) United States corporation; ) and DOES 1 through 25, ) ) ) Defendants. ) Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“Defendant” or “BANA”) filed its Notice of Removal [1] on April 27, 2020. In its Notice of Removal, with regard to the citizenship of Plaintiff Truong Le (“Plaintiff”), Defendant stated, “Because Plaintiff is a citizen of California, and BANA is a citizen of North Carolina, complete diversity of citizenship exists.” Notice of Removal ¶ 11, ECF No. 1. In support of diversity jurisdiction, Defendant states that “Based on the Complaint, Plaintiff is domiciled in Los Angeles County,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.