Ara Malakian v. Geico Casualty Insurance Company
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20202:20-cv-02348California646 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
5/15/2020 Case No. 2:20-cv-02348-SVW-KS Date
Ara Malakian v. Geico Casualty Insurance Company et al Title
Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Paul M. Cruz N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
N/A N/A
Proceedings: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND [15]
Plaintiff Ara Malakian’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand is DENIED. Geico’s Notice of Removal in this action on the basis of diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 was defective, because it failed to affirmatively allege Plaintiff’s citizenship. See Kanter v. Warner-Lambert Co., 265 F.3d 853, 857 (9th Cir. 2001) (“Absent unusual circumstances, a party seeking to invoke diversity jurisdiction should be able to allege affirmatively the actual citizenship of the relevant parties.”) While Geico’s Notice of Removal was facially defective, the Court cannot ignore Plaintiff’s Reply brief and supporting declaration, both of which assert that Plaintiff is not…