Victor v. Ramirez v. The People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20205:20-cv-00982California1,799 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 20-0982 CJC (PVC) Date: May 14, 2020 Title Victor V. Ramirez v. Superior Court of California

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT

THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED BECAUSE IT IS

COMPLETELY UNEXHAUSTED

On April 30, 2020, Petitioner Victor V. Ramirez, a pre-trial detainee proceeding pro se, filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (“Petition,” Dkt. No. 1). While the Petition is extremely difficult to decipher, Petitioner appears to assert at least the following grounds for federal habeas relief: (1) the superior court lacked jurisdiction; (2) the criminal complaint failed to charge a public offense; (3) the prosecutor knowingly used perjured testimony; (4) Petitioner’s arrest was unconstitutional. (Id. at 6-7). Petitioner seeks his immediate release and monetary compensation for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.