Bruce A. Aronson v. FCA US, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20202:19-cv-09386California4,493 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 BRUCE A. ARONSON and SECURE Case No.2:19-cv-09386-JFW-JPR

TECH

6 Plaintiffs, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER1

v.

FCA US LLC; RYDELL CHRYSLER

DODGE JEEP RAM and DOES

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

through 10, inclusive

Defendants.

14 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 15 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 16 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 17 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 18 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 19 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 20 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 21 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 22 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 23 under the applicable legal principles.

B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT This action is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.