Edmond Neal v. Culichitown Bell, Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20202:20-cv-04426California469 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 20-4426-CJC-JPR Date: May 19, 2020
Title: EDMOND NEAL V. 8841 JASON KOLAHI, ET AL.
PRESENT:
HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Gabriela Garcia N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY
THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S UNRUH ACT CLAIM
Plaintiff filed this action against Defendants, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). (Dkt. 1 [Complaint, hereinafter “Compl.”].) He also asserts three related state law claims. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief under the ADA and statutory damages under the Unruh Act. Plaintiff contends that this Court has jurisdiction over his ADA claim based on the existence of a federal question and jurisdiction over his state law claims based on supplemental…