Brandie Kristine Andregg v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20205:19-cv-01017California3,943 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 BRANDIE K. A., Case No. EDCV 19-01017-RAO 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ANDREW SAUL,

Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Brandie K. A.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Commissioner’s denial of 20 her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”).2 For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the action is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Order. ///

1 Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 27 2 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew M. Saul, the current Commissioner of Social Security, is hereby substituted as the defendant herein. II. PROCEEDINGS BELOW On January 9,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.