Charles N Belssner v. Circle Dental

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20205:20-cv-00631California1,267 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES N. BELSSNER, ) CASE NO. ED CV 20-631-FMO (PJW) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR ) FAILURE TO PROSECUTE v. ) ) CIRCLE DENTAL, ET AL., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) In March 2020, Plaintiff Charles N. Belssner filed this pro se civil rights action against Circle Dental, the California Commission on Judicial Performance, the State of California, and Superior Court Judge Randall D. White. (Complaint at 1, 6-7.) Though the Complaint was difficult to decipher, it appeared that he was alleging that Circle Dental charged him too much for dental work, that Judge White had abused his discretion during Plaintiff’s trial against Circle Dental, that the Commission on Judicial Performance had “disregarded the plight of the disable[d] to seek equity,” and that the State of California had failed to provide oversight over certain business, like Circle…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.