Geraldine Anderson v. Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20202:20-cv-01655California741 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is Plaintiffs Geraldine Anderson’s, Yolanda James’s, and Yvonne Frazier’s (“Plaintiffs”) motion to remand this case to California state court. (Dkt. No. 24.) Defendant Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp. (“Defendant”) opposes Plaintiffs’ motion. (Dkt. No. 46.) The Court found this matter suitable for decision without oral argument and took Plaintiffs’ motion under submission. (Dkt. No. 57.) For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion. Il. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed this action against Defendant, Aerotek, Inc., and Jamie Doe in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles, on December 31, 2019. (Dkt. No. 1). In their initial complaint, Plaintiffs alleged violations of California’s Government Code, Civil Code, and Business & Professions Code. (See Dkt. No. 1-1 at 3.)

CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk CB

On February 20, 2020, Defendant removed Plaintiffs’ suit to this Court. (Dkt. No. 1.) In its notice of removal, Defendant contends that there is complete diversity of citizenship among the named parties, as Plaintiffs are citizens of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.