Jay Maloney v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20208:20-cv-00639California434 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case Nos. 8:20-cv-00639-JLS-KES Date: May 27, 2020 Titles: Jay Maloney v. FCA US LLC, et al. Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Terry Guerrero N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

Plaintiff Jay Maloney filed this action in Orange County Superior Court on February 25, 2020. (Compl., Doc. 1-2.) On April 2, 2020, Defendant FCA US LLC (“FCA”) removed the case to this Court, asserting diversity jurisdiction. (Notice of Removal, Doc. 1 at 1.) As the party invoking the removal jurisdiction of this Court, Defendant bears “the burden of establishing federal jurisdiction.” California ex rel. Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc., 375 F.3d 831, 838 (9th Cir.), opinion amended on denial of reh’g, 387 F.3d 966 (9th Cir. 2004). And “the district court ha[s] a duty to establish subject matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.