Daniel Moizel v. Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 DANIEL MOIZEL, Case No. 2:19-cv-8527-DSF-JEM 11 Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING CONFIDENTIAL v. INFORMATION 13 IRONSHORE SPECIALTY [Discovery Document: Referred to 14 INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott] corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 15 Defendants.
17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 21 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 22 and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be warranted. 23 Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 24 following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does 25 not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that 26 the protection it affords from public disclosure and use…