Jae Jeong Lyu v. John Yutan

1

JS-

3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAE JEONG LYU, Case No. 2:20-cv-00333-JVS-AFM Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

13 v. 14 JOHN YUTAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On February 3, 2020, plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) was denied: The complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; it was barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994); and leave to amend would be futile. Accordingly, plaintiff was ordered to pay the full filing fee within 30 days. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of the February 3 order (ECF No. 6) was denied on April 9, 2020 (ECF No. 9), andPlaintiff was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to pay the full filing fee. (ECF No. 11.) On May 22, 2020, plaintiff filed his response to the order to show cause. (ECF No. 12.) As previously found by the Court, the complaint does not allege a federal civil rights cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and it is barred…