Dr. Sumayyah Al Nasser v. Shay Serdy

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20202:20-cv-03582California288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 DR. SUMAYYAH AL-NASSER, Case № 2:20-cv-03582-ODW (Ex) Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v.

DISMISS [9] AND MOTION TO

14 SHAY SERDY et al., ENFORCE [10] AS MOOT Defendants. 16 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Defendants Shay Serdy and Peter E. Barker-Homek filed a motion to dismiss 2|| Plaintiff Sumayyah Al-Nasser’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 3 || Procedure 12(b)(6) and a “Motion to Enforce Federal Rule of Evidence 408,” which 4|| the Court construes as a motion to strike portions of the Complaint. (See Mot. to 5 || Dismiss, ECF No. 9; Mot. to Enforce, ECF No. 10.) On May 26, 2020, Plaintiff filed 6 || a first amended complaint in lieu of opposing Defendants’ motions. (FAC, ECF No. 18; Notices of Filing, ECF Nos. 19-20.) Defendants do not challenge the 8 propriety of Plaintiff's filing an amended complaint and request the Court vacate the 9 || pending motions. (See Defs.’ Req.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.