Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Kristina Trujillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20202:18-cv-09577California1,408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

3

United States District Court Central District of California 10 11 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Case № 2:18-cv-09577-ODW (JPRx) 12 COMPANY, Plaintiff-in-Interpleader, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. RECONSIDERATION [70] 15 KRISTINA TRUJILLO, ALEC 16 TRUJILLO, TERA TRUJILLO, and

MICHELE TRUJILLO,

17 Defendants-in-Interpleader. 18 I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court is Defendant-in-Interpleader Michele Trujillo’s 21 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order denying her motion for summary 22 judgment (“Motion”). (Mot. for Recons. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 70.) For the reasons that 23 follow, the Motion is GRANTED.1 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff-in Interpleader Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) 26 initiated this action in November 2018 against Defendants-in-Interpleader Kristina

28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.