Lidia Gonzalez v. County of Los Angeles

I. INTRODUCTION

17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Lidia Gonzalez, Richard Arciga, and 19 Yesenia Martinez’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order 20 granting Defendants Patrick Frey (“Frey”), a Deputy District Attorney, and the County 21 of Los Angeles’s (the “County”) (collectively “County Defendants”) motion to dismiss 22 (“Motion”). (Mot. for Recons. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 37.) For the reasons that follow, 23 Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED.1 II. BACKGROUND The Court addressed the relevant factual allegations and procedural history in its 26 Order granting County Defendants’ motion to dismiss and incorporates that discussion

28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. 1 here by reference. (See Order Granting County Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss (“Order”), ECF 2 No. 31.) The following brief summary is provided for context. This matter arises from an arrest allegedly without probable cause and the 4 subsequent alleged malicious …