Raja Pile-Hijr v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RAJA P., Case No. 2:19-cv-02018-GJS
Plaintiff
v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant.
17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Raja P. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her applications for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 10 and 27] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 17 (“Pl. Br.”), Dkt. 23 (“Def. Br.”), Dkt. 26 (“Reply”)]. The matter is now ready for
In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party. 27 Andrew M. Saul, now Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is 28 substituted as defendant for Nancy A.…