Raja Pile-Hijr v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20202:19-cv-02018California6,088 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAJA P., Case No. 2:19-cv-02018-GJS

Plaintiff

v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant.

17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Raja P. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her applications for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 10 and 27] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 17 (“Pl. Br.”), Dkt. 23 (“Def. Br.”), Dkt. 26 (“Reply”)]. The matter is now ready for

In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party. 27 Andrew M. Saul, now Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is 28 substituted as defendant for Nancy A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.