Ik Soo Jeon v. Martin Frink

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

IK SOO JEON, ) NO. CV 17-6383-JFW (AGR)

) 12 Petitioner, ) ) 13 v. ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS 14 MARTIN FRINK, Warden, ) AND RECOMMENDATION OF ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 Respondent. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. In Ground One, Petitioner argued the trial court erred by allowing the prosecution to argue that any bone fracture automatically qualified as a great bodily injury during closing arguments. Petitioner again objects that the prosecution misled the jury into believing that all bone fractures are great bodily injuries. (Dkt. No.…