Dean Himbler Aviles v. Jason Ur

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20202:20-cv-02621California1,887 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEAN HIMBLER AVILES, ) Case No. CV 20-2621-JGB (JPR) 12 ) Plaintiff, ) 13 ) ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED v. ) COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 14 ) JASON UR et al., ) 15 ) Defendants. ) 16 ) 17 On March 19, 2020, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil-rights action against Defendant Long Beach Police Detective Jason Ur in his individual and official capacities, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and compensatory and punitive damages. He was subsequently granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On April 13, the Court dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend. On May 5, he filed a First Amended Complaint, adding Lynd Jason Allen, Thomas Joseph Smith, and Heather L. Cohen as Defendants. (See FAC at 1.) He now purports to bring a “qui tam” action under the False Claims Act. (Id.) 28 1 After screening the FAC under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court finds that its allegations fail to state a claim on which relief might be granted. Because its claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.