Griselda Estala v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20202:19-cv-04536California1,066 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court Central District of California 10 11 GRISELDA ESTALA, Case № 2:19-cv-04536-ODW (JCx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED v. MOTION TO REMAND [27] AND

DENYING AS MOOT

15 TARGET CORPORATION, et al., DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [26] Defendants. 17 I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Plaintiff Griselda Estala initiated this slip and fall action in the Superior Court 20 of California, County of Los Angeles, on February 27, 2019. (Notice of Removal ¶ 1, 21 ECF No. 1; see Notice of Removal Ex. A (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1.) Defendant Target 22 Corporation (“Target”) removed the action to this Court on May 24, 2019, based on 23 diversity jurisdiction. (Notice of Removal ¶¶ 4–10.) On May 15, 2020, Plaintiff moved to remand the case (“Motion”) after emailing 25 Defendants on May 5, 2020, indicating her intention to bring the motion. (See Mot. to 26 Remand (“Mot.”), ECF No. 27; Decl. of Soheil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.