Jerry Anderson v. On Habeas Corpus

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20202:20-cv-04868California1,684 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-4868-CJC (SP) Date June 11, 2020 Title JERRY ANDERSON v. ON HABEAS CORPUS

Present: The Sheri Pym, United States Magistrate Judge Honorable Kimberly I. Carter n/a n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: n/a n/a Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Why Petition Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction On May 27, 2020, petitioner filed a document titled “Requesting Investigation on Habeas Petition Pertaining to Timeliness and Misconduct by Courts,” which the court has docketed as a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”). But the “Petition” does not in fact appear to be a true habeas petition that presents a cognizable claim for federal habeas relief, among other defects. As such, it appears this court lacks jurisdiction to grant the relief petitioner seeks. Failure to Name Proper Respondent As an initial matter, it appears this court lacks jurisdiction because petitioner fails to name a proper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.