Nina Karen Moses v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
NINA M., Case No. 2:19-cv-0703-GJS
Plaintiff
v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 16 Defendant.
18 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Nina M. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 9 and 10] and briefs addressing disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 16 (“Pl. Br.”), Dkt. 23 (“Def. Br.”), Dkt.
In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party. 27 Andrew M. Saul, now Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is 28 substituted as defendant for Nancy A. Berryhill. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). 24 (“Reply Br.”)]. The matter is now ready for…