Richard Alan Nolan v. Charles W. Callahan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD ALAN NOLAN, Case No. 8:18-cv-00847-FMO-MAA 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

CHARLES W. CALLAHAN, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation, which the Court received and filed on March 25, 2020 (“Objections”). (Objs., ECF No. 41.) Respondent did not file a timely response to the Objections. As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. Petitioner argues in the Objections that the Magistrate Judge erred in her analysis that the state court’s application of California’s timeliness bar was not…