Diane Benton v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20202:19-cv-09830California4,452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIANE BENTON, an individual; DAVID BENTON, an individual, Case No. 2:19-cv-09830-VAP-GJS

Plaintiff,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

v. ORDER1

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, a Federal Corporation Created by Congress (Amtrak), 16 Defendant. 17 18 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 27 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.