Tracye Benard Washington v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20202:19-cv-00169California4,842 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, Case No. CV 19-169-VAP (KK) Plaintiff, v. FINAL REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, ET AL.,

Defendants.

16 17 This Final Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Virginia A. Phillips, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. I. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Tracye Benard Washington (“Plaintiff”) proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) alleging correctional officers at California State Prison – Los Angeles County in Lancaster, California (“CSP-LAC”) violated his Eighth Defendants Hanks, Romo-Munoz, Lizama, Hernandez, Wingfield, Rosales, and Pressnell…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.