Tracye Benard Washington v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20202:19-cv-00169California4,842 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 10 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, Case No. CV 19-169-VAP (KK) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINAL REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

13 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CORRECTIONS AND

14 REHABILITATION, ET AL.,

15 Defendants.

16 17 18 This Final Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable 19 Virginia A. Phillips, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and 20 General Order 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of 21 California. 22 I. 23 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION 24 Plaintiff Tracye Benard Washington (“Plaintiff”) proceeding pro se and in 25 forma pauperis, filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 26 1983 (“Section 1983”) alleging correctional officers at California State Prison – Los 27 Angeles County in Lancaster, California (“CSP-LAC”) violated his Eighth 1 Defendants Hanks, Romo-Munoz, Lizama, Hernandez, Wingfield, Rosales, and 2 Pressnell…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.