Guri Gonzalez v. B and G Khinda, Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20202:20-cv-05390California716 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. CV 20-5390-DMG (ASx) Date June 23, 2020
Title Guri Gonzalez v. B and G Khinda, Inc. et al. Page 1 of
Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT
SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS
The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. sections 12010- 12213, and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code sections 51-53. It appears that the Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and state law claims in the action, which include a claim under California’s Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 54 et. seq., a claim…