Kristal Reyes v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20202:19-cv-05209California4,065 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 KRYSTAL REYES, as Guardian ad 2:19-cv-05209-GW-KSx 12 Litem for I.R., a minor, Consolidated with 2:20-v-471-GW-KSx 13 Plaintiff, [Hon. George Wu; Hon. Karen L. 14 vs. Stevenson, Magistrate]

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE

ANGELES COUNTY PROBATION ORDER REGARDING

17 DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES PRODUCTION OF

COUNTY CHIEF PROBATION CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS

18 OFFICER TERI L. McDONALD, AND INFORMATION 19 DEPUTY PROBATION OFFICER

PUENTE, DEPUTY PROBATION

20 OFFICER STANCE, and DOES 1 TO 21 10, Defendants. 22 23 The following protective order applies to the two cases, Krystal Reyes v. 25 County of Los Angeles, et al (2:19-cv-05209-GW-KSx) and Irie Reyes v. County of 26 Los Angeles (2:20-v-471-GW-KSx), which were consolidated on April 14, 2020 27 (see Dkt. No. 20 in 2:20-v-471-GW-KSx): 1 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary, or private information for which special protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.