John L. Miller v. D. A. White
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 JOHN L. MILLER, Case No. CV 14-7543-GW (KK) Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
AFFIRMING DISCOVERY ORDER
v.
D.A. WHITE, ET AL., Defendant(s).
15 16 I. INTRODUCTION On June 10, 2020, Plaintiff John L. Miller (“Plaintiff”) constructively filed1 “Objection to the Court’s 5-27-20 Discovery Order” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 121. As set forth below, the Court has considered Plaintiff’s Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s May 27, 2020 Order and finds the Order is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Objection is overruled and the May 27, 2020 Order is hereby AFFIRMED. /// 26 1 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se prisoner gives prison authorities a pleading to mail to court, the court deems the pleading constructively “filed” on the date it is signed. Roberts v. Marshall, 627 F.3d 768, 770 n.1 (9th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted); …