Errol Locke v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

O

7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California

9 10 PLAINTIFFS IN PRO PER ERROL AND Case No. 2:19-cv-08854-ODW (JPRx) TABATHA LOCKE, Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS [26] WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY, Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Errol and Tabatha Locke (the “Lockes”), proceeding pro se, bring this action against various defendants for multiple claims based on an alleged wrongful foreclosure sale of their home (the “Subject Property”). (See First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) at 3., ECF No. 21). Defendant Wells Fargo, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) moves to dismiss the Lockes’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (See Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 26.) For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. 27 28 I. BACKGROUND In 2005, the Lockes took out a loan in the amount of $340,000 backed by a 3 deed of trust in the Subject …