HGCI, Inc. v. Luxx Lighting, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. EDCV 19-570-PSG (KKx) Date: June 30, 2020 Title:
Present: The Honorable KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEB TAYLOR Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present
Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Compel [Dkt. 46]
On May 15, 2020, Defendant Luxx Lighting, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a Motion to Compel Plaintiff HGCI, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) to provide supplemental responses to Interrogatories Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7, Requests for Admission Nos. 1-4 and 8-13, and Requests for Production Nos. 1-3 and 8 (“Motion to Compel”). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 46. On June 4, 2020, the parties filed supplemental briefs and advised the Court that the sole discovery requests remaining in dispute are Interrogatory No. 7 and Requests for Admission Nos. 1-4. Dkts. 53, 54. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Compel is DENIED.