Gregory Munoz v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20202:20-cv-04925California1,611 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-4925 FMO (MRWx) Date June 30, 2020 Title Gregory Munoz v. Walmart, Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff: Attorney Present for Defendant: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Remanding Action On April 28, 2020, Gregory Munoz (“plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Walmart, Inc. (“Walmart” or “defendant”) asserting claims related to his employment. (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at ¶ 1 & Exh. 1, Complaint). On June 3, 2020, defendant removed that action on diversity jurisdiction grounds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (See Dkt. 1, NOR at ¶ 6). Having reviewed the pleadings, the court hereby remands this action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

LEGAL STANDARD

“Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.