Monica Sehovic v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20205:19-cv-00953California8,833 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

13 On March 3, 2016, Plaintiff, formerly employed as a chart prep clerk at a medical office and as a customer service supervisor at a casino (see AR 304, 483-85), filed an application for Disability Insurance Benefits alleging a disability onset date of March 1, 2014. (See AR 435-41). Plaintiff’s application was denied, initially on May 5, 2016, and, on reconsideration on July 12, 2016. (See AR 344-47, 352- 56). 21 On May 4, 2018, Plaintiff, represented by counsel, testified at a hearing before Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Josephine Arno. Vocational expert (“VE”) Lawrence Haney also testified at the hearing. (See AR 301-18). On May 23, 2018, the ALJ issued a decision denying Plaintiff’s request for benefits. (See AR 18-30). Applying the five- step sequential process, the ALJ found at step one that Plaintiff had 28 The case was reassigned to the undersigned Magistrate Judge on April 2, 2020. (Docket Entry No. 18). not engaged in substantial gainful activity from March 1, 2014, the alleged disability onset date, through March 31, 2017,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.