Brett Lauter v. Michael Rosenblatt

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20202:15-cv-08481California4,587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRETT LAUTER, ) Case No. CV 15-08481 DDP (KSx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION ) FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MICHAEL ROSENBLATT; ECHO )

BRIDGE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC; )

PLATINUM DISC. LLC; ECHO ) BRIDGE HOME ENTERTAINMENT;, ) [Dkt. 269, 275] 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Presently before the court is pro se Plaintiff Brett Lauter’s 20 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Having considered the 21 submissions of the parties, the court denies the motion and adopts 22 the following Order.1 23 24 1 Plaintiff first filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings raising arguments virtually identical to those raised here. (Dkt. 25 269.) Plaintiff filed the instant motion for summary judgment soon after, before Defendant filed any opposition to the initial motion 26 for judgment on the pleadings. As Defendant eventually argued, the motion for judgment on the pleadings went well outside the 27 pleadings. (See Dkt. 284.) Although Plaintiff did not concede as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.