Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 RYAN MARK WABNITZ, Case No. 8:20-cv-00188-MWF (SHK)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

UNKNOWN, et al., JUDGE

Respondents.

17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition (“FAP”), the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. Although the Court provided Petitioner with an extension to file objections after receiving returned mail, no objections have been filed. It is clear from the record that Petitioner has failed to keep the Court apprised of his address as required by the Local Rules. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the case should be dismissed because (1) abstention is required under Younger and (2) Petitioner has not exhausted his state court remedies. With respect to…