Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Rose Sickle

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20202:20-cv-05710California933 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-5710 PA (DFMx) Date June 29, 2020 Title Deutsche Bank Nat’! Trust Co. v. Rose Sickle

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE T. Jackson Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER

The Court is in receipt of a Notice of Removal filed by Rose Sickle (“Defendant”). Defendant is attempting to remove an action commenced by plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Plaintiff”) in Los Angeles Superior Court on June 10, 2019. Plaintiff's Complaint asserts a single cause of action for unlawful detainer. By citing to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157, 1334, and 1452, and alleging that this action 1s a “core proceeding,” Defendant appears to allege that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction on the basis the Court’s bankruptcy jurisdiction. Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.