Arthur Rosengren v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20202:19-cv-09064California5,121 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Lance D. Wilson SBN 183852 lance.wilson@tuckerellis.com 201 Mission Street, Suite 2310 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.617.2400 Facsimile: 415.617.2409

TUCKER ELLIS LLP

Justin E. Garratt SBN 253520 justin.garratt@tuckerellis.com 515 South Flower Street Forty-Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2223 Telephone: 213.430.3400 Facsimile: 213.430.3409 10 Attorneys for Defendant

RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

11 f/k/a United Technologies Corporation (erroneously sued as “successor-in-interest to PRATT & WHITNEY ENGINE 12 SERVICES, INC.”)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15 ARTHUR ROSENGREN, an individual, Case No.: 2:19-cv-09064-SVW-E 16 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL AND v. EXPORT-CONTROLLED MATERIALS CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION, et 19 al., [Discovery Document: Referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick] Defendants. Action Filed: October 3, 2019 Trial Date: November 3, 2020…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.