Warden

Ronald Rollings v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20202:20-cv-01724California939 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No. CV 20-1724 JVS (MRW) RONALD ROLLINGS,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. WARDEN, Defendant.

19 The Court dismisses this action without prejudice due to the failure 20 of a pro se litigant to amend his complaint or respond to court orders. 21 * * * 22 1. This is a prisoner civil rights action. Plaintiff is an inmate at 23 the federal prison facility at Terminal Island. He contends that 24 unidentified prison staff violated his rights by opening his “legal mail” and 25 allegedly withholding certain items from him. The complaint also includes 26 vague allegations about the denial of medical treatment. (Docket # 1.) 27 28 2. In February 2020, Magistrate Judge Wilner screened the original complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Judge Wilner dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. The dismissal order noted, among other defects, that Plaintiff failed to name any individual defendant as liable for the alleged misconduct. To the extent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.