Tanya Malch aka Tayna Petrovna v. Daniel G. Dolan

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20205:15-cv-00517California1,787 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TANYA MALCH a/k/a TANYA ) Case No. EDCV 15-00517 DDP (KKx)

PETROVNA, )

) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION ) FOR NEW TRIAL AND GRANTING DANIEL G. DOLAN, an ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY individual; ANDREA McGINTY, ) FEES an individual; NATIVE FOODS ) HOLDINGS CORPORATION; et al., [Dkt. 185, 189, 200, 202] 17 Defendants. 18 19 Presently before the court is Plaintiff’s “Notice of Motion and Motion for New Trial” (Dkt. 189) and Defendant’s Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. 185). Having considered the submissions of the parties, the court denies Plaintiff’s motion, such as it is, grants Defendants’ motion, and adopts the following Order. I. Discussion A. Plaintiff’s “Motion” for New Trial Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59, a motion to alter or amend a judgment, or a motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.