Marcus Lancaster v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20202:11-cv-04340California1,355 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 11 MARCUS LANCASTER, ) No. CV 11-4340-VBF (PLA) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, ) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) DOMINGO URIBE, Jr., Warden, ) ) Respondent. ) ) 17 On February 19, 2020, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”), recommending that petitioner’s Fourth Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. (Docket No. 192). On April 2, 2020, petitioner, who is represented by the Office of the Federal Public Defender, filed Objections to the Report. (Docket No. 195). The Magistrate Judge’s Report adequately addresses the bulk of the arguments raised in petitioner’s Objections. One argument, however, warrants further discussion. In his Objections, petitioner argues that the Magistrate Judge erred in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.